Aug 3, 2023

Fame-iness :Summary And Question Answers

 Fame-iness 

 - Megham Daum

Summary And Question Answers



Summary:

Fame has always been one of the greatest allures for thousands of people. If a person had an outstanding talent, he or she could find admirers and, with the help of hard work and a little bit of luck, become a celebrity. With the development of mass media and the Internet, however, a person can become famous overnight, and possession of talent is not required. In her article, Megham Daum speaks exactly about such fame and she coins a special term for it - fame-iness which is similar to the usual fame, only for it is fleeting and is not based on extraordinary abilities to sing, act, paint or do anything else much better than the others.

Daum confesses that she does not know most of modern celebrities Really, being famous means to be known to general public, to le recognized on the streets, to be a household name. If someone speaks about Madonna, Sting, Michael Jackson, Bill Clinton and others, he or she does not have to explain the interlocutor who all these people are, because everyone knows them. If you meet one of them in the street, you are surprised and happy. Still, the chances that one can run into them somewhere in a supermarket are very slim, because they have their own assistants who do all the shopping for them. Such celebrities are so admired and beloved and respected that it seems that they are not like real people. They have got millions of fans all over the world, each of whom dreams of being similar to them, to meet them in person, to marry them, etc. That is probably why they are called stars - everyone can see them and enjoy the way they "shine", but they are absolutely unreachable. Looking at modern stars, however, I see that they do not correspond to my own definition of fame, and, as Daum says, "these days it seems that only crotchety dinosaur types like me still harbor such provincial notions of what it means to be famous."

A. Comprehensive :

Q.1. According to Daum, What does it mean to be famous?

ANSWER : According to Daum being famous means being unskilled, untalented, and annoying.

Q.2. How does Daum define a celebrity?

ANSWER : Daum defines a celebrity as someone who is easily recognized in the street and who has made an effort to become well known through his or her work and talent.

Q.3. What does Daum mean in paragraph 7 when she says, "it's pretty clear that it's never been a worse time to be famous"?

ANSWER : I think Daum feels that being a celebrity now days aren't as valuable as it used to be. It's not about talent anymore, and there is a lot of competition.

Q.4. How does Daum see today's celebrities as different from those of years ago? Does she see things as positive or negative?

ANSWER : In my opinion I think that Daum sees todays celebrities in a negative light. Back then celebrities had to be talented and make a huge effort. Now days it seems like anyone can become famous regardless if they have talent. I believe Daum sees all new celebrities as untalented people

Q.5 What do you think Daum means in paragraph 6 by "tabloid-targeted exploits"? Can you give examples of such exploits?

ANSWER : In my opinion, celebrities such as Paris Hilton, Snooki, and Kim Kardashian have become famous because of a "tabloid-targeted exploit". What I think Daum intended by that phrase tabloid-targeted exploit is amateur, inexperienced people that are famous because of the audience that are making them famous by watching their shows, purchasing their magazines, clothing line, and following them on social media.

Q.6. In paragraph 9, Daum says, "Fame is no longer about reaching the masses but about finding a niche somewhere." Give some examples of what a "niche audience" might be.

ANSWER : A niche audience is a select group of people that have a unique interest. For example a niche audience can be a group of people who are only interested in certain celebrity such as Paris Hilton, Honey Boo-Boo, and J-Wow to name a few.

Q.7. What does Daum see as the positive side of the "democratization of fame" (10)?

ANSWER : She believes that because fame no longer depends solely on acceptance from the masses, this gives room for those who create less conventional work to achieve success.

Q.8. According to Daum, what is the difference between "actual fame" and "fame-iness"?

ANSWER : Daum defines "actual fame" as requiring talent and work to achieve, while "fame-iness" is the result of rising to popularity through attention grabbing scandals and humiliation.

B. Purpose and Audience :

Q.1. This essay discusses fame and celebrities in general terms but gives very few examples. What examples does Daum provide? Why do you think she doesn't include more?

ANSWER : The examples she provides of "famous people" are all quite established in their careers and have been around for a while. The celebrities with "fame-iness" were at the height of their fame several years ago and achieved this fame through scandals. She likely didn't include more examples because doing so would leave her at risk of causing a scandal herself; she probably wanted to avoid coming off a bashing specific public figures.

Q.2. What is Daum's attitude toward her audience? How do you know? Does paragraph 5 offer any information that might help answer this question?

ANSWER : Daum assumes that her audience has heard critiques of current celebrity culture before. She believes that her audience has preconceived notion about what a discussion about the changing nature of fame will look like and assures the reader that she hopes not to repeat the same points that they have already heard.

C. Style and Structure :

Q.1. Does Daum include a formal definition of fame-iness in her essay? If so, where? If not, supply one.

ANSWER : Daum does not explicitly state a definition of "fame-iness", but its meaning is implied. Fame-iness is a kind of fame achieved by gaining attention with shocking and inappropriate behavior. This kind of fame is generally short-lived and caters to a niche audience.

Q.2. Where does Daum explain her term's origin?

ANSWER : Daum explains the origin of "fame-iness" in paragraph 11, when she talks about "truthiness," a word coined by Stephen Colbert. Colbert's "truthiness" was a way to describe how people tend to believe ideas and theories with no concern as to their truthfulness. Daum believes that the way the public handles information could be compared to how the public handles fame.

Q.3. Where does she define fame-iness by negation? By analogy?

ANSWER : Daum defines fame-iness by negation in paragraph 11 and 12, in which she says that "fame-iness" is not achieved with accomplishments or talent. She defines it with analogy in paragraph 12, writing that "Instead of a reward for a job well done, it's more like a punishment for cutting corners."

Mar 17, 2012

Claggart's deep antagonism


Billy was totally unaware of Claggart's deep antagonism towards him. Even when he observed something strange at times in Claggart's behaviour, he felt soon reassured when Claggart spoke a few pleasing words to him. 


This is what Melville says in this connection:
He (Billy) thought the master-at-arms acted in a manner rather queer at times. That was all. But the occasional frank air and pleasant word a went for what they purported to be, the young Sailor never having heard as yet of the "too fair spokesman."
Had the foretopman been conscious of having done or said anything to provoke the ill will of the official, it would have been different with him, and his sight might have been purged if not sharpened, as it was, innocence was his blinder (BBS 49)
In this chapter we know that because of his ignorance and his innocence rendered him totally incapable of perceiving any evil in the man. We are also told that the after guardsman, after having received a rebuff from Billy, did not much bother him again except for nodding to him as a mark of recognition or speaking to him a pleasant word or two. The after guardsman had surely realized that the very simplicity of the Handsome Sailor had rendered him formidable enough to resist all evil. Furthermore we know the psychoanalysis of Claggart.

Mar 15, 2012

Keats, "Ode to Nightingale

Ode to a Nightingale


The world is full of chaos and disorders justice is rarely found. Melville writes in the letters to Nathaniel Hawthorne "But truth is the silliest thing under the sun"(65). How this world goes!


Here, where men sit and hear each other groan;
where palsy shakes a few, sad, last gray hairs,
where youth grows pale, and spectre-thin, and dies.
(Keats, "Ode to Nightingale,"24-6)
John Keats in the above verse depicts the condition of man who is sad, diseased, pale and thin, and whose life is perpetually under groan, pangs and suffering. The same condition is of the modern man where Billy cannot escape. He is amid the suffering, groan and pang. His desires are paralyzed. His grief and despair are the product of world wars. Meantime Melville comes into this world and he depicts the theme of 20th century tragic vision in his stories and novels. He presents contemporary problems caused by the outbreak of the war. It is his age that provided the subjects maters for his stories and novels. He modified all these subject mattes with his personal experiences. His chief preoccupation has been the portrayal of hardship of the external world and his main character's excessive capacity of endurance and fortitude. Billy is the one who never tried to understand the Dansker's comment about Claggart attitude. He couldn't under4stnad the world is not like him who endure all sorts of accusation.